By: 32slim32
Well President Obama is off on another vacation and this one
with a price tag of over $4 Million to the taxpayer. What’s that? Oh, “Bush
took over 1,000 days of vacation”. Yes, we have all heard it. Whether you read
it at Politifact or somewhere else, it all comes back to CBS’s Mark Knoller. He
keeps “detailed records” of the Presidents scheduled (since Gerald Ford)
appearances, speeches, travels, and vacation days. He has somewhat been the
authority on Presidential “vacation days” because of his “detailed records”.
First, let’s define what a “vacation day” is in Mr.
Knoller’s “detailed records”. A
“vacation day” is a “day OR a PARTIAL day” that the President is not at the
White House or Camp David (although he does keep track of days and trips to
Camp David, he does not count them as “vacation days” since they are usually
week end trips). Notice, I said Knoller does not count days at Camp David as
“vacation days”, however, when you hear people saying “Bush took over 1,000
days of vacation” those are still Knoller’s
numbers because he does keep track of days at Camp David. It is the
combination of Knoller’s “vacation days” and Knoller’s days at Camp David
records.
While Mr. Knoller has not published an “official list” (that
I have been able to find) of Bush’s numerous “vacation days”, he does
consistently publish his numbers (you know, every time Obama goes on vacation),
and they are consistent.
The main claim I want to address in this article is,
according to Mr. Knoller, “President George W. Bush spent even more time away
from the presidential mansion in the nation’s capital than Reagan. Of the 77
total "vacation" trips the former president made to his Texas ranch
while in office, nine of them — all
or part of 69 days — came during his first year as president in 2001,
according to Knoller.” Again, notice the “all or part of 69 days”.
As I mentioned above, I have not been able to locate an
official list that Mr. Knoller has published, however, I did find a list that a
local television station maintained of all of Bush’s visits to Texas at http://www.kwtx.com/centraltexasvotes/misc/37768449.html.
This list is very detailed. There were eight instances in which they did not
list a departure date. In all eight instances I used a Monday departure date,
as the majority were listed as “Weekend Visit”.
After having to make 8 assumptions on departure days (that
were unlisted), I came within 3 days of Mr. Knoller’s number. His number was 77
trips for 490 days or partial days away from the White House, I came up with 487
days. Not too bad, I thought.
What is missing from Mr. Knoller’s report is a whole bunch
of asterisks. For instance, a weekend visit to Camp David does not count as a
“vacation day” (by Knoller’s standard). Mr. Knoller’s numbers include 130 days
or partial days that would not be charged as “vacation days” with a Camp David
destination, just from weekend visits to the Crawford ranch.
Another little asterisk that Mr. Knoller could have included
would have been that at least 29 “vacation days” were meeting with leaders from
other nations at the ranch, like:
- Vladimir Putin in November 2001
- Tony Blair in April 2002
- Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah April 2002
- Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar Bin Sultan August 2002
- Chinese President Jiang Zimen October 2002
- Spanish President Jose Maria Aznar February 2003
- Australian Prime Minister John Howard May 2003
- Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi May 2003
- Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi July 2003
- Mexican President Vicente Fox March 2004
- Egypt President Hosni Mubarak April 2004
- Mexican President
Vicente Fox & Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin March 2005
- Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon April 2005
- Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah April 2005
- Colombian President Alvaro Uribe August 2005
- NATO Secretary General Jaap De Hoop Scheffer May 2007
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel November 2007
- Danish Prime Minister February 2008
How did Mr. Knoller’s “detailed records” forget those little
details?
Another little asterisk that Knoller could have included
would be how Bush was charged with 4 days or partial “vacation days” by flying
off to Iraq in November 2003 to visit the troops. Or another 7 “vacation days”
while visiting wounded troops.
Another thing Knoller doesn’t come right out and mention,
the 2 hour flight from Washington to Crawford counts as a “partial day”
vacation each way. So there are 154 “vacation days” right here. And that brings
me to the biggest anomaly in his record keeping. While a four hour round trip
counts as two “days or partial days” away from the White House, a five hour
golf outing doesn’t even register as time away from the White House. How does that work, four hours on a plane is
two “vacation days” and a five hour trip to the links is like you never even
left the White House?
So of the 490 days or partial days away from the White House
(aka “vacation days”) it breaks down like this:
- 130 days or partial days on weekend visits to Crawford (that
wouldn’t be counted if @ Camp David)
- 29 days (At the minimum) of meeting with world leaders while
“on vacation”.
- 11 days of “vacation” visiting troops
- 154 “partial days” of vacation travelling to and from
That leaves 166 days of “vacation”, but in that, there are
still meetings with economic advisers and security advisers, and some day trips
that Bush took during his extended August stays at the ranch.
The next time you hear someone referring to Bush’s vacation
days and using Mark Knoller’s numbers you now know how he inflates the
numbers. Maybe then ask how Obama hasn’t
run up more days or partial days away from the White House than he has with 90
trips to the golf course.
Interesting little tid bit about Camp David. I believe the
main reason Mark Knoller does not count time at Camp David as vacation time is
because Jimmy Carter spent 376 days of his 4 years in office at Camp David, according
to Mark Knoller.
Disclaimer from The Elephant in the Room: The
article posted above is the work of a blog reader, not an owner of the
blog. In promoting an open forum blog, and believing that the passing of
information is the reason we exist, we happily post most readers' work
with little editing. While the article does appear on our blog, the
owners of The Elephant in the Room did not write this article, and
posting this article on our blog does not imply endorsement of the ideas
and opinions expressed in the article. If you would like us to post
your work, please submit it to loudmouthelephant@gmail.com
